Crossing the line on Steve Jobs health English English Espaol Reviews Top Categories More Categories Car Tech Cell Phones Desktops Digital Cameras Home Audio Laptops Printers Tablets Televisions Forums Appliances Camcorders Cell Phone Accessories E book Readers Games moncler Men Book gray Hoodies Spring Autumn Gear GPS Hard Drives Storage Headphones Home Video Internet Access Monitors MP3 Players Networking Wi Fi Peripherals Software Wearable Tech Web Hosting You are here: News Latest News Mobile Startups Cutting Edge Internet Media Security Privacy Business Tech Crave Apple Microsoft Politics Law Tech Culture Blogs Video Photos RSS Download Windows Software Mac Software iOS Apps Android Apps The Download Blog CNET TV Most Popular New Releases Products Tech Shows How To Always On CNET On Cars CNET Update Googlicious Next Big Thing The 404 XCAR How To Appliances Computers Home Theater Photography Privacy Productivity Security Smartphones Tablets Web How To Video Deals Today s Deals Coupon Codes Marketplace Blog Log In Join Facebook Timeline options Log In Join CNET Sign in with Facebook Timeline options My profile Log out Anyone with a genuine ounce of concern for Steve Jobs health should remember the golden rule of medicine: first, nhl jerseys do no harm. Presumably carrying the torch for concerned Apple investors, Henry Blodget of Silicon Alley Insider has apparently decided to make it his personal mission this summer to shame Apple into revealing whether or not Jobs pancreatic cancer has returned, aided and abetted by timely "hedge fund sources" from The New York Post who claim that Jobs is scaring business associates with his appearance and this despicable throw away thought from CNET Blog Network contributor Matt Asay suggesting without a shred of evidence that the launch issues with MobileMe and the iPhone 3G might be the result of poor oversight from Jobs due to his health. Just for a moment, put aside the nonsensical notion that the day to day performance Moncler Men yellow and purple stripes all of wool Sweater of a 20,000 person company is based entirely on the health of one man. Blodget and those openly speculating about Jobs health offer no support for their viewpoint other than his appearance and the fact that he once had cancer. There are indeed real issues for Apple to consider about Jobs health and what constitutes material disclosure to investors. But they ve been covered before: back in 2006 when the same rumors about Jobs health made the rounds, and last year when an article in Fortune revealed that Apple waited nine months to disclose that Jobs had been diagnosed with cancer back in 2003. To repeat, there is no universal moncler navy standard for how companies are expected to disclose the health issues of their executive officers, the way there are standards for how companies are required to disclose material financial information. Corporate governance experts generally agree that a company s board of directors has the responsibility to determine whether the health of its CEO affecting his or her ability to run the company. Likewise, the CEO has a responsibility to be honest and up front with the board of directors over the true state of their health. Apple was forced to address the issue during Monday s conference call with a statement that will unfortunately do little to dampen the speculation. CFO Peter Oppenheimer read this statement during the call: "Steve loves Apple. He serves as CEO at the pleasure of the board, and he has no plans to leave Apple. So what would Blodget and those calling for full disclosure require to be satisfied? Should Apple break out Jobs white blood cell count on the earnings statement next to the number of iPods sold in Japan? Should Apple have to put out an 8 K every time Jobs visits an oncologist for a checkup? Taken more broadly, should Microsoft have to release the results of Steve Ballmer s last physical because a shareholder new moncler points out that he s a bit overweight and a bit high strung? Blodget suggests that Jobs is "arguably Apple s single most valuable asset," and therefore, if that asset is impaired, the shareholders have a right to know. To be sure, we all know that Steve Jobs is far more actively involved with the design and development of Apple s products than the average CEO and that Apple probably wouldn t have made it back from the abyss of the mid 1990s without his leadership and foresight. But Jobs is just a man. He s not a demigod sent to lead us down the path to technology enlightenment. He moncler vest for women s not a finely crafted design arbitration widget. And he s not merely an "asset," as Blodget himself admits at the end of his latest post on the matter. Steve Jobs has a family. He has kids. Those kids presumably have Macs in their home that connect to the Internet and allow them to read all this uninformed speculation about what is first and foremost a family matter. One clear sign that this is an unseemly exercise: if those who keep pushing the issue feel they have to repeatedly apologize for seeming insensitive, they re probably being insensitive. Yes, Jobs is cheap moncler coats for men the CEO of a $135 billion company that has dramatically changed the world of technology and made countless people rich. And, as I wrote the last time we covered this, Apple s board of directors has a clear duty to avoid falling into a situation resembling Woodrow Wilson s final days in office. However, the only responsibility that Apple s board of directors has to its shareholders is to make sure that Steve Jobs health is not a liability, and disclosing anything beyond that would be a mistake. They don t have to get into the details, as BusinessWeek s Arik Hesseldahl suggests: just say Moncler Down Jacket Black Chamonix doudoune they ve talked it over with Steve, and if there s no reason to be concerned, say best moncler jacket "there s no reason to be concerned." This whole affair reminds me far too much of Star or US Weekly speculating about whether an actress is pregnant, or anorexic, or a drug addict, based on a picture. I m sure that all those involved in those stories were genuinely concerned for Britney s health, too
Moncler ski Women jackets with hooded zip big neck pink
Moncler ski Women jackets with hooded zip big neck pink
5.0(from 28540 votes)
146.9USD
256.9USD
Text and images are provided by National Palace Museum
|